Defendant William Rojas' guilty plea in Federal Court today has opened a window into the government's next likely prosecution.
The charges against Rojas were filed in a document called an Information. In federal court, an indictment, an information and a complaint basically mean the same thing on a substantive level and all serve the same function. Each initiates a criminal case and informs the defendant of the charges against him/her. They are also intended to insure that a prosecutor has sufficient evidence to establish probable cause that a crime has been committed.
One big difference between an indictment and an information: an information does not require a grand jury’s vote, an indictment does.
Today's development suggests that the Feds have taken a pass at any alleged VBM-bribery schemes during Hoboken's 2014 election cycle; the 5 year Statute of Limitations to prosecute will expire any day. Folks who might have worried about that, breathe easy.
Folks who have exposure for 'activities' during Hoboken's 2015 election cycle, not so much. Because Matt Calicchio and now, William Rojas, have plead guilty to crimes committed during that cycle. And while each respective Information for Defendants Calicchio and Rojas implicate "Candidate 1" and "Candidate 2," the Rojas Information further describes the alleged roles of these unidentified co-conspirators, and appears to encircle "Candidate 1."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V WILLIAM ROJAS INFORMATION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PRESS RELEASE
Another one bites the dust
ReplyDeleteAnd another one gone, and another one gone
Another one bites the dust
Hey, I'm going to get you too
Another one bites the dust
Who is candidate number 2?
ReplyDeleteHow about you go worry about where you live and let Big Holmes worry about doing the ratting in Hoboken
DeleteScott earned his stripes. Don’t be rude.
DeleteWhat stripes he was a zimmer flunky. Now if you want to talk about cheese Holmes is your man
DeleteEZ to figure out who the person is... Just look up who ran their own committee...
ReplyDeleteNo names, please. Every defendant has the presumption of innocence until proven guilty by a trier of fact. I believe that anyone who participated in the alleged crimes deserves whatever they get, but until they are officially named, they are unnamed. There is something very toxic in our city's politics, that people would risk everything they've built- including their families- for what? Or course the fault lies with people who roll the dice, with so much at stake.
DeleteGA can we continue to refer to Holmes as a RAT because he's guilty of being one. Correct?
Delete