Rinse and Repeat: Bhalla never supported Russo for Council Prez, but...



...look who's been floating Ruben Ramos as a viable candidate for City Council president! 
"Word is, Jen and Tiff are aligning with Ruben Ramos..."
Apparently, these Council members have decided that Jim Doyle is not their "friend" any more. Therefore, 30 years of public service to Hoboken doesn't matter. Jim will be punished. So will Hoboken. Because two butt-hurt Councilwomen didn't like his "nasty" campaign.    

Can you believe this $hit?

Here is the latest "resistance" comment from ForeverAdvocate, believed to be Councilwoman Tiffanie Fisher:

"Jim Doyle showed his true colors during this campaign. He allowed his name to be listed on nasty mailing after nasty mailing, attacking his "friend" for her being a Republican, in what was supposed to be a non-partisan election. By the way, let's please not lose sight of the fact that Ravi and Vijay were at the core of the move the election movement, and promised many members of the public that there was no risk of our municipal elections becoming partisan if they were moved to election day. Sadly, that same duo made this election more partisan than every other campaign combined. Talk about selfish and insincere."

Oh no!  That litany of grievances was so sad it made Karen Nason cry!

Cheer up Karen, they've only got 2 more years!

Folks, governing is for grown-ups. The 2nd /6th Ward Councilpersons are acting like spoiled children who didn't get their way. Giattino didn't want to join the Transition even though she was asked twice. She pulled her name off the Hoboken Public Education Fund mailing list. Fisher is allegedly blogging about how "selfish, nasty" Jim and Ravi are.   

This Ramos merger is motivated by desire for vengeance, to obstruct the Bhalla administration in every way, while holding the City of Hoboken hostage. Same as the Beth Mason crew's "Council of No." The Council of No tried to kill the Hospital sale and bankrupt the City of Hoboken, and stopped the 9-11 memorial from being approved, just to name a few of their achievements.   

Oh, and speaking of the Beth Mason crew, look who gave Ramos the maximum allowable individual donation the day before the 2015 election? 


Nice bedfellows you picked, Councilwomen.

Do you like where this Council is headed? "Resistors" do not want our new Mayor to succeed. They are thinking about themselves, not us. 

Here are Mayor Elect Bhalla's choices for the next Council President:  
"Ravi's first choice is Jim. Second choice is Peter"
Two solid Reform choices: Jim Doyle and Peter Cunningham,  but Fisher and Giattino picked Ruben Ramos

You know, elections have consequences. It is fair to give Jim Doyle a shot as Council President, since he has never held that role and he won his election.  

It is an act of SORE LOSER-HOOD not to at least give the man a vote.  

Cunningham is a fine option if the Council sore-losers cannot bring themselves to support Jim. I would like you-all to read Jim's bio, then give me 5 good reasons why he does not deserve an up-or-down vote for City Council President.  

JIM DOYLE BIO 

August 2017, marked the thirty-year anniversary of Jim Doyle moving to Hoboken. He came from law school to start a career in environmental law with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s New York City office, where he continues to work today as a supervisor in the legal office. Along the way he married his wife, Leah Healey, has led the Hoboken Harriers running club and their charity events for the past 22 years, served on the hospital’s managing board in its time of crisis, advocated for more park space through his involvement in HobokenParks.Org, serves on the Green Team, and most recently he is serving on the City Council and the Planning Board.

Four years ago, Jim ran for City Council for the first time, and he articulated certain goals. They included improved zoning and planning in our City, park acquisition and uses, green infrastructure, less reliance on residential development, and bike and pedestrian safety.

Jim has chaired the Council’s Zoning and Master Plan subcommittee for the past four years and has served for the past three years on the Planning Board, as the Council’s designee. In the face of tremendous development pressure, stemming largely from our current economic conditions, Jim has worked with his council colleagues to amend the zoning laws and with fellow Planning Board commissioners to hold the line in an effort to preserve many of those things that make our City so special. The Build-out analysis that Jim urged be performed has been completed, and its conclusions will inform the on-going Master Plan Re-examination process where we evaluate what zoning changes are necessary in the face of external changes facing in our City.

Part and parcel with the Master Plan Re-examination process, Jim has publicly advocated for future development that is focused on commercial uses, rather than residential, to both stem the increase in population and provide more local job opportunities in Hoboken for our residents. Jim also serves on the Council subcommittee that generated the plan to preserve the Neumann Leathers Building as a space for small businesses and artisanal uses. Jim advocated for Neumann Leathers as a great example of how we can preserve and rehabilitate existing buildings to create a home and flexible space for such small businesses.

Park acquisition was a significant reason Jim was motivated to run for Council four years ago. And the City’s results in the past four years in this regard have been impressive. Jim has steadfastly supported the Mayor and the Administration’s use of its available tools to acquire over nine acres of park land, such as the Southwest Park (through eminent domain), the park under construction at 7th and Jackson Streets (through redevelopment negotiation process), and the newest Pop-up park in northern Hoboken (through a traditional, negotiated sale). Jim chaired the ad-hoc Council subcommittee regarding the acquisition of that Pop-up park, and he is eager to see it become a permanent park that will also help alleviate local flooding during storm events.

As a member of the Council’s Environmental Services Committee, Jim has urged for additional funding in our budget to ensure proper and enhanced maintenance of our present and future parks. On that Committee, Jim is also proud to have played a role, working with the Administration, in arriving upon a design and implementing the construction of a 9/11 Memorial of which we can all be proud.

As part of the above-mentioned zoning changes, Jim advocated for and obtained zoning amendments to incentivize Green Infrastructure in building projects in Hoboken. As a US EPA employee, Jim is committed to environmentally sensible development. As a member of the “Green Roofs for Health Cities” certification program, he saw to it that green roofs were included in those amendments, and through his roles on the Council, the Planning Board, and his continued membership in the Green Team, he has helped facilitate rain-barrel installations, rain-garden projects, and encouraged LEED certification for developments. Jim has also been actively engaged in the Rebuild By Design process, by attending and testifying at many of the RBD public hearings.

Lastly, but certainly not least, Jim is a bicycle and pedestrian safety advocate. Jim understandably supports pedestrian safety efforts, as he has been the head of the Hoboken Harriers running club since 1995. Jim also promotes bicycle safety; he was the co-founder of Hoboken’s first free bike-sharing effort, called “Hobiken”, and consistently supports bicycle and pedestrian-friendly initiatives. Jim believes more people on foot or on bikes means fewer cars on the road, cleaner air, and a healthier citizenry.

While Jim has certainly seen a lot of physical changes in the past 30 years, the reason he chose to make Hoboken his home remains unchanged. The friendly neighborhood feel of the City, the ease and convenience of getting around to so many great local businesses, and the diversity of people make Hoboken the place Jim wants to live and a community he wants to fight to preserve.

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting guesses, Indie. I'll tell you 2 things: I am not "me," I use one screen name here, thats it. (2) Each of those screen names corresponds to a unique individual. You may disagree, but elected officials should not behave like political operatives, and advocate for themselves using pseudonyms- period.

      Delete
    2. ha...nancy is much more clever and insightful than "me".

      Delete
    3. I don't know about that,"me" --I'm flattered that Indie thinks I'm you ("me")!

      Delete
    4. I see that the village idiot has reappeared. She is the proverbial cockroach; she will survive nuclear war just so that she can torture everyone by babbling her own unique brand of foolishness. I don’t know why anyone ever bothers to engage the slug. As I have said before, she left her credibility at the Willow Avenue Bridge eons ago and she does nothing in her posts here to disabuse her lack of moral and ethical integrity. You have to appreciate her ability to engage in intensely hypocritical moral indignation by invoking the kindergarten level “two wrongs make it right” or “I know I am but so are you” reasoning.

      She was clueless the first time that I encountered her and remains clueless to this day. I first met the idiot at an event to discuss some aspect of rent control more than a few years ago. I had no earthly idea who she was. I happened to be seated towards the rear of the room and behind her (she was sitting with a man who I also did not recognize). At some point, she trotted up to the front of the room to give a “speech”. I don’t recall exactly what she said, but I clearly recall that I could not follow any train of her word salad approach to an oral presentation. It was incoherently inconsistent and rambling. It also seemed clear that nobody else in the room was following her bizarre speech and there were a few catcalls at her during various points. She was beyond longwinded and when she was finished there was dead silence. Clearly, she did not know how to read a room. BTW, there appeared to be an even mix of pro and anti people in the room. She did not appear to reach any of them with her rhetoric. She came back to her seat and plopped down with a very smug look on her face and proceeded to regale her companion with her belief that she had nailed her presentation and that she had effectively commandeered the issue. She was almost squirming with delight at her mental and oratory skills. I leaned over to a gentlemen sitting two seats away and asked if he knew who she was. He rolled his eyes and told me her name. In a soft voice he said that she was a crack pot and then gave me the crazy sign.

      She is still crazy and still impressed with her nonexistent powers of persuasion. IMO, She is just sore that the Mayor did not give her the tenant advocate position and the she was pinning her hopes on Jen to get something in return for her awesome intellectual arguments in support of the Reform Resistance movement. Indie is beyond flexible in her ability to twist her ethics and opinions into a pretzel. IMO, she supports a position or issue only to the extent that there is something in it for Indie. And no Indie, no one is interested in listening to you drone on with more of your drivel. So fuck off.

      Delete
  2. Earth to Jen, you have nobody to blame for Hoboken rejecting your candidacy for mayor except yourself. You were never going to win once the mayor endorsed Ravi. You can whine all you want. You can pull the Bit Mazon petulant child routine at every CC meeting. You can reflexively vote no on every agenda item put forward by the mayor. You can even back a dark sider for CC President. The only thing you and your associate Tiffanie prove with such actions is how right city residents were in voting for Ravi.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While in my opinion, an elected official writing on blogs under a pseudonym is ill advised, I don't think there is anything illegal or unethical about it.

    Whoever the poster is, the stuff they are writing is pretty dumb so I can see why they would prefer to remain anonymous, especially if they hold public office.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The twitter poll has 89% of the people say that city council members should not be posting on blogs under pseudonyms. Sure it is only 9 votes (it closes tuesday), but THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN!

      Delete
  4. At this point it seems Jen and Tiffanie think they are far more clever than they are. The idea seems to have been to plant a story that Ravi was working behind the scenes to make Russo Council President so T&J can claim they supported Ramos to block this, deflecting responsibility for their vote to Ravi.

    Ladies if you make a deal with the old guard people won't be fooled and they will remember. Try to create a new "Council of No" and people will be watching. Rather than play game how about creating a a 2018 council record you can be proud of, people will remember if you do.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Tiffanie faction together with rhe DeFusco faction can make anyone they want council president.

    The idiotic story about a Ravi/Russo deal is mathematically impossible. It's been a long time since Roman Brice got that amazing 96 on the high school geometry regents exam. Maybe he needs a refresher course. A remedial writing course might be helpful as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think FAP is correct, that Sybil the Horse in cahoots with the Crybaby Cabal, cooked up the Ravi/Russo ruse as cover for hopping in the sack with Ramos. So dishonest!

      Delete
    2. GA - why are you surprised with them being dishonest? They went dirty as soon as Jen put her name in the hat - then complain about everyone else going dirty when they have already been there and done that. They complain about people calling out Jen for being a Republican (uh, duh, she is one and most of us have a problem with electing Republicans given the stuff they are doing right now) then turn around and blast Ravi for being a card carrying Democrat. They claim Ravi is angling for higher office so we shouldn't have supported him but ignore the fact that he served out his term and Jen was the only person angling for a higher office in the race. And then Jen promises to exit the race if she has no chance of winning and will fracture the reform vote. She not only doesn't do that, she costs reform 1 CC seat. We have fake polls put out by them (or discussed by them) showing Jen surging to first place, but where did she finish? Dead last among the credible candidates. And then don't even get me started on the self serving SOBs that Jen surrounded herself with. They are so focused on "winning" that they forgot about everything else.

      Dishonesty was the one consistent theme throughout Jen's campaign. I don't expect it to stop now that her campaign crashed and burned. And I also don't expect her handful of nutjob supporters to regain their sanity. If anything, I expect them to double down on their dishonesty and rush to the store for more tinfoil. Time for more tinfoil hats for the Reform Resistance - which is only really resisting reality but that little factoid is between them and their psychologists.

      Delete
  6. The question you have to ask of the residents of Butthurtia at this point is would they be happier (or less miserable) if Defusco had won. You already know the answer, and it's pretty disturbing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Our headline was "Ravi Bhalla Backs Michael Russo for Council President!"

    How are you reading into that that we were saying Ravi Bhalla was "supporting" Michael Russo for City Council President??? Can someone explain that bizarro-land extrapolation to me? Is this because you're still mad that we finished first among non-cheating, non-hate-flier-dependent candidates? Get over it, we just ran a better campaign that resonated with non-cheating, non-hate-flier-influenced voters. Crybabies.

    ReplyDelete
  8. rumor has it sybil the horse heard the russo info from the boys of summer...it's just grist for the mill right now but they are circling city hall and reliable non-phony sources say they will spring into action very soon, probably within days or maybe weeks but at the most months from now (well, maybe years) to slap the handcuffs on unelectable-elect for crimes as yet unknown to everyone but sybil.

    no limp-wristed advocates at the barn, it's full-on honey badger mega-resistance, baby!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sybil the Horse wrote this with one of his 16 screen name personalities,"Pyhric Win" (it's spelled "Pyrrhic") on HCV: " What they did with that inside job on the flier is an utter disgrace. What will they say when the truth of it comes out?

      On a serious note, when are his so-called resistance "friends" going to stop using him and stage an intervention? He clearly needs a lot more help than a blog-break, not a single "friend" sees that?

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. well why should they stage an intervention? they can continue to use MSV and the other "blog" just like they used during the election - have them say all the gross garbage and they get to keep it seemingly "clean". So the "friends" just have to nod and be supportive and give thumbs up per each post of lies and "breaking news".

      Delete
    4. No need. He disabled thumbs up/down months ago and notice on the resistance website they also got rid of the thumbs down function. None of those tools really want any dissent. It really is quite funny those two have turned into giant snowflakes. BTW, the deliberate stripping of those functions that used to exist on both sites just tells me that both proprietors know they are full of horse crap.

      Delete
  9. Several of Jen's key backers were instrumental in shepherding Ramos into the scene in the first place and managed his campaign or ran alongside him in his first go-round on the council in '01. Many of them quietly supported his mayoral campaign in '13. People don't like to talk about it, but it's true. Go ask Carol Marsh and her main cohorts whether they supported Zimmer for re-election to her second term.

    To anyone looking at the lay of the land with clear eyes and hard truth, there is nothing surprising about this development whatsoever. It would actually have been illogical to expect anything else.

    But now that the masks are off, let's be sure to keep them off. Never forget who these people really are, and that "REAL Reformer" has always been and will always be a red-herring moniker designed to confuse and distract from whomever's sitting opposite its bearer in the Coach House booth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Home run again, RB. Unholy alliances abound, despite the lingering stench of rumors still clinging to all concerned. Still, it was too funny to see DeFusco attack Romano about trying to win two seats while aligning himself with the triple-pensioned Ramos.

      Delete
  10. The administrator of our All New! website -- which is not called Same Stiff, Different Morgue and also not called Hoboken Resistance, Advocate, Stills and Young, you assholes -- has already designated Ruben as the correct, soberly arrived at, journalistically proper choice for next Council President. As has our double secret regular contributor The Tiffanatrix! We expect concurrence soon from one or more of the many faces of Sybil the Horse, making it more or less unanimous. So you can all stop speculating. Despite our inoperable case of Butt-Hurt, we have risen above tragedy, aka, democratic election results, to make this decision for you.

    You're welcome.

    ReplyDelete
  11. LMAO. I read this article in the NY Post and I couldn't help but to think if you switched around some of the names, it would 100% apply to Hoboken.

    https://nypost.com/2017/11/27/mccain-to-clinton-get-over-it-already/

    Read the parts where it says "justify why you lost and how you were mistreated" as well as "she doesn't have anything else to do". Switch around the names and insert peeps from the sour grapes brigade and this article is so Hoboken it isn't funny.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At least, so far as we know, Clinton has not become pro-russian in the wake of her defeat.

      Delete
    2. LOL She's not "pro" any culture other than the culture of money. :)

      Delete
  12. it's tough to work hard and pour your heart and soul into a campaign for many months and then lose. and not just lose, but to come in fourth place (arguably "last place" among the serious and well-funded candidates). so i get that it's difficult to shake off, as obama once called it, "a shellacking" but it's what separates the true leaders from the make-believe ones. i've had my share of policy disagreements with john mccain and will forever curse him for picking sarah palin as running mate and for all intents and purposes opening the pandora's box of reality-tv mentality in politics that led to trump, but he remains a leader and a man of convictions.

    while it has unfortunately become a lot to ask for similar leadership in local politics, i truly hope all council members can rise above their personal gripes to deliver what's best for the city. one good thing about politics is there's always an election around the corner and politicians are held accountable for how well or poorly they deliver what's best for the city.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment