DeFusco is confusco about Washington Street re-design


But those trees! Those trees!
Those Truffula Trees!
All my life I'd been searching
for trees such as these.
The touch of their tufts
was much softer than silk.
And they had the sweet smell
of fresh butterfly milk.

Mayor Zimmer is no greedy Onceler, hacking down trees to knit Thneeds (that everyone needs).

On February 17, 2016, 8 members of the Hoboken City Council, including Councilman Mike Defusco voted for an improved, safer Washington Street re-design- a resounding "Yes".

The only "No" vote came from Councilwoman Jen Giattino:
City Council President Jen Giattino was the only Council member to oppose the plan.”I personally am not comfortable with nine council members, who are not engineers, sitting here designing Washington Street,” said Giattino.
Well, that's what real engineers are for, Jen!

The City Council doesn't design hotels either, yet Giattino voted "yes" for a 24-story hotel in the Post Office redevelopment plan on April 23, 2017;  Ravi Bhalla and Jim Doyle voted "no" because of the building's excessive height.

Back on February 17, 2016  T&M, the project engineers, presented the elements of the re-design:
At the meeting, representatives from T&M Associates (the engineering firm who is heading the project) brought insight from Hoboken residents... Some favorable upgrades included synchronized lighting, new traffic signals, new water mains, ADA curb ramps, and establishing a micro-grid to act as an electrical backup system and roadway resurfacing. 
Aren't you curious why Giattino voted against so many pedestrian safety upgrades to Washington Street?

So, here we are in August and the construction is behind schedule, folks are not happy. Can you blame them?    

Further, nineteen trees were slated for removal during the construction of the Washington Street re-design; after three were removed, a public outcry to save the trees has caused the City to put a hold on the further tree removal.  Last Friday, the City announced:

City of Hoboken Release: August 18, 2017 

Meanwhile,  Hoboken mayoral candidate Mike DeFusco (who unlike Thneeds, nobody needs) boasted on a recent mailer:
“A Record of Success... As Chair of the Parking and Transportation Committee, worked with businesses, City Council and the Administration on a plan for an overhaul of Washington Street...” 
Well, Defusco must be confusco, because now he is trying to disown the Washington Street redesign which he voted "Yes" for!

Confusco DeFusco has requested  a Special Meeting to  to address "destroyed sidewalks and tree removal", telling Hudson County View:
Um... this is Mr. Shake Shack, who wanted to put a 14 condo-unit building with a 2-story commercial space's, residential entry and commercial deliveries fronting on historic Court Street.

What about "irreversible damage" to  Court Street's character? 

Confusco DeFusco, Chair of the Parking and Transportation Committee, didn't figure out that the plan he voted for-- ripping up Washington street for new engineering and re-design-- would "destroy sidewalks and trees"?

Further, Confusco erroneously blames the City for "never looking at the report before removing the trees"...

Um,  the "report" confusco DeFusco refers to is a new evaluation for  engineering alternatives in order to save or replant existing trees.  According to the City's August 18th press release:
"We are working to save or replant existing trees where possible, including an evaluation by the project engineer to determine if possible drainage alternatives would result in keeping some or all trees. No more trees will be removed until the City has reviewed the engineer’s report."
Oh yeah, GA hears that no Special Meeting has been scheduled.

Comments

  1. In fairness to Jen I think her no vote reflected opposition to the CC making changes on the fly - overruling the engineers for some political grandstanding.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess the other 8 were "unfair" in voting to proceed with plans to improve Washington Street and make it safer for pedestrians.

      Delete
  2. Excellent work on this blog post Nancy. Very well researched and argued.

    I have a morbid but firm thought to share: I think Anthony Romano will be the next Mayor and reform will lose the Mayor's office and City Council. We're too divided. Anthony like a veteran has stepped in when he saw he has a real shot st winning and has just stood there while we all shoot at each other. I'm expecting that 8 years of hard work will go to waste and I don't get why. What are the real policy and posture differences? Jen supports a 24 story hotel, Ravi and Jim don't. Jim writes, the Jackson St PILOT, thinks we got a great deal, Jen does not. Sometime reasonable but overwhelmingly aligned minds disagree. People are losing friendships and their character over what? Where are the adults in the room?

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was just providing some context for Jen's vote.

    Together with the rest of the council, she supported the entire plan, bumpouts and all. Given that I hope and assume she will restate that support when DeFusco and Ramos attack the bumpouts and not join the hypocritical anti bump out chorus to placate people like Indie.

    Jen was privately the strongest supporter on the council for the dedicated bike lanes on Washington street. But when the pushback came, she pretended it was only the Mayor by herself who supported them.

    As mayor would Jen make her position publicly clear on difficult issues and lead? That is not something she did on the Council. Her silence on the rent control referenda, the HoLa lawsuit and her failure to publicly advocate for bike Lanes she privately strongly supported are but three examples among many that raise questions about her inclination to be all things to all people rather than lead.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for the post NumbersCruncher. I did not know about her silence on the HoLa suit too. Interesting. The rent control referendum and Hola suit were as big stakes issues as there were in town. Why would Jen just keep quiet? Baffling. I get that you're saying she's afraid to take strong positions. I don't know her well enough to make that assessment. What I can see though is a failure to say anything when big ticket questions are before the community. Why?

    Doesn't matter I guess since Anthony is lining up to be Mayor and we are about to lose deal with years of nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  6. i don't think mike is confusco about anything, he's just being a slippery politician who will say whatever he thinks will benefits him at the time. it's interesting that one of his opponents seems to be the polar opposite, someone who supposedly harbors strong private opinions on topics but appears to be scared to commit to anything publicly for fear of offending anyone.

    some of our so-called political "leaders" are a pretty sorry bunch.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Need a little help here, folks-
    I'm really burning to find out who an NHSA commissioner is endorsing for mayor. Anyone know where I can find that out? I know it sounds a little arcane to make front page news anywhere, but I'm just champing at the bit for this piece of political trivia and wondering if there's anyplace that purveys in this type of obscurity.

    Thanks in advance!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I beg to differ, SGI!

      There is no way any reputable Hoboken news site would spill cyber-ink on such an inconsequential endorsement by a North Hudson Sewerage Authority Commissioner! "Who cares?" does not do the matter justice! You could only be referring to some trashy, low-rent tabloid! A piece of cyber garbage!

      Now, I happen to know that Emnet Ed is supporting a mayoral candidate, but really, who cares? Why in G-d's name would that merit a front page story! Unless of course bits of my brain begin to die off... then I might conside posting the bloviations of an NHSA Commissioner!

      Delete

Post a Comment