I took a look, and saw that someone had posted the article "Debate SHOCK: Parents United thugs harass 1-2-4." The comments below that referenced this blog were free and fair comment, opinion, etc., but of course, one-sided. I wanted to rebut two statements which either mischaracterized or misunderstood content on Grafix Avenger.
I posted two brief, civil comments.
My third post was longer; a civil rebuttal to this:
After I posted the third comment I noticed a typo. So, I put it in "Edit" mode, corrected the typo, but when I tried to re-post, this is what I saw:
That's when I noticed all of my comments were deleted, and my posting privileges blocked.
So, I will have to post my screen-capped rebuttal here.
What Parents United DIDN'T want you to Read
It's understandable that Parents United might not care for me/my message, but if they are publishing pointed comments about this blog content/author (me), it is only fair to offer me a rebuttal. Parents United folks are welcome to comment here.
GA wasn't rude. Just honest.
In fact, GA is a proven stalwart defender of free and open online political discourse, even when it gets hot (and it does).
Read about it here...
Folks, the 'Dark Side' folks supporting Parents United will use any means to silence (and punish) their critics and political opposition: from a flashlight in the eyes at a debate, to thugs making a ruckus in the back of the Elks Club, or even using the COURTS to silence political discourse.
|Parents United operative blinds slate 1-2-4 with flashlight|
Hence, Parents United cannot disown the APE shining a flashlight in 1-2-4's eyes; he is them, their Magilla Gorilla.
1-2-4 doesn't play like that.
Reform doesn't send thugs and apes to meetings to disturb the peace and intimidate political opponents.
Reform doesn't use the COURTS to silence political opposition. Want to know how that ended?