 |
| Proof the district fared far worse under Dr. Petrosino. Thank you, Kids First! |
GA isn't sure what did it.
Was it pointing out the hypocrisy of the Raslowsky-Petrosino Era's utterly dismal QSAC scores- including the "34%" in DPR area "Instruction and Program"?
Was it pointing out the 4 out of 5 QSAC scores he had redacted in the June 2014 letter were 90%, 96%, 100% and 100%?
Was it pointing out that the 'summary' of the 2013-2014 QSACs were 69%, and the 45% was an outlier?
Was it the crapademic graph corrected by GA, showing the tremendous advances the district has made under Kids First after the Petrosino/Raslowsky era?
WHO KNOWS.
But Dr. Petrosino erased the entire post; an admission that is was as GA called it, "CRAP."
Oh yeah, this is a short clip of Interim Superintendent Dr. Brockel's May 12 announcement that the new QSAC score for our district in "Instruction and Program" is 75%.
GA thanks Kids First for the wonderful job they are doing, and continue to do for the children of our district- including mine.
*"retracts/retracted" changed to "erases/erased" per comment by Anonymous May 15, 2015 at 10:01 AM
By retracted do you mean took it down or published an acknowledgement that the information was incorrect with the correct info then provided?
ReplyDeleteGood point. I guess I wasn't clear. He took the whole thing down- it's gone.With no acknowledgment it was a dishonest, manipulative piece of crap.
DeleteHe never should have posted the "poopie" in the first place.
ReplyDeleteWhatever he posts in the future should be viewed as even greater suspicion.
If I ate a bowl of alphabet soup, I could shit out a better post than his. Love the graphic, GA!
ReplyDeleteDr. 34 Percent.
it's absolutely right to call out this liar when he posts BS on his blog. however, there's a bigger question: who the hell even reads his blog?? honestly, who? no one outside his inner circle and us even know it exists. yes, it's important to counter all bogus arguments like his but honestly, no one knows about, let alone reads, his trash.
ReplyDeleteHe's a dishonest old guard tribalist who uses charts and graphs the way the way a bad magician uses smoke bombs. He's a disgrace to the better opportunities life has given him.
ReplyDeleteDon't think of it as a blog, think of it as a tool in the old guard toolchest. The stuff he writes about Kids First are talking points coordinated with others, like his blogging as prosbus and curious gal was coordinated with others-lane and kim for example. This 45% lie is another talking point launched on his political operative blog.
ReplyDeleteThe point that nobody reads his blog is irrelevant. It's not supposed to be read. It's supposed to be quoted, to appear in the HR, to be repeated and linked in blog comments. Since Petrosino is alleged to be an academic, sourcing him, his blog is supposed to impart credibility. As you can see, he deserves none. He's nothing but a dishonest, bitter shill for the old guard. Why he risks his academic career on such juvenile postings is beyond me.
I suspect he has tenure and is risking nothing. He could say the world is flat and that the sun revolves around the earth and as a tenured professor, he'd keep his job.
Deletei guess so, anon @9:02, i don't know. just feels we're giving this liar too much credit for an influence that i see no proof he has in real life. so some OGs and anti-kid's first people "source" him, who cares? what does that accomplish? and the HR would just make up shit to suit their anti-reform agenda if this guy didn't exist, again no evidence that their articles move the needle in any way.
Deletei get that the world would be better if this liar didn't post his lies, but i just don't see that he's made any difference. maybe i
i'm wrong.
Dr. 34% convinces the nutters to repeat his trash. Lynn Danzker would screech about the 45% QSAC and omit the better scores, too. The charters aren't inspected, so there's no way of knowing what scores they could attain. Apples to Oranges. They love that shit.
ReplyDeleteSo he admitted he was caught lying again. It's a start.
ReplyDeleteRemoving an article from a blog is not a retraction. "Doctor" Petro is an educational tool and COWARD. He did not withdraw, or refute his original statements.
ReplyDeleteA person with any shred of decency would have printed a retraction accompanied by an apology for previous error and/or expressions of gratitude to persons who disclosed the error to the author. This will never happen. He has no principles and is not a decent man.
Hmmmm. Maybe "Erased" would have been a better choice of words,
Delete