tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post4756726554745727744..comments2023-09-17T06:34:32.273-04:00Comments on Grafix Avenger: WABC Radio Bombshell: "He's a Paid Hack"Grafix_Avengerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09277322207313098473noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post-78240361597659421182013-09-19T19:56:05.498-04:002013-09-19T19:56:05.498-04:00But if a paid hack falls in the forest and there&#...But if a paid hack falls in the forest and there's no one to hear him, did he make a sound?Grafix_Avengerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09277322207313098473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post-83240132421696562132013-09-19T12:03:26.708-04:002013-09-19T12:03:26.708-04:00It's fine to call him a paid hack because he i...It's fine to call him a paid hack because he is, in fact, a paid hack. And since the core of his legal argument is that he is not, in fact, a paid hack, when, in fact, he is, the "value" of the WNBC remark is self-evident and warrants no explication.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post-88538553640262821652013-09-19T11:22:39.945-04:002013-09-19T11:22:39.945-04:00First you need to understand that: (1)Plaintiff is...First you need to understand that: (1)Plaintiff is a public figure which implicates the actual malice standard (2) and saying that he's a 'paid hack' is non-actionable and falls in the categories of privileged speech which include: (1) time barred by the statute of limitations, (2) true, (3) substantially true, (4) opinion, (5) not of-and-concerning Plaintiff(s) (6) non-defamatory, (7) satire, (8) rhetoric, and/or (9) hyperbole. The burden of proof is on the Plaintiff, not the accused.<br /><br />These matters are not decided on blogs or in the court of public opinion. I won't get into legal arguments of this case, but you can look at documents on file if you wish to understand them better:<br /><br />http://www.scribd.com/doc/152069005/Lane-Bajardi-and-Kim-Cardinal-Bajardi-Litigation-Pincus-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment Grafix_Avengerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09277322207313098473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post-37292080428807522592013-09-19T10:44:00.860-04:002013-09-19T10:44:00.860-04:00I don't get the "value" of the WNBC ...I don't get the "value" of the WNBC remark. If someone calls him a "paid hack" isn't he running the risk of litigation himself if he can't prove said person is paid. Help us understand this better.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post-49542246939101571972013-09-19T09:32:11.793-04:002013-09-19T09:32:11.793-04:00Yes, your point has merit. I am sure Plaintiff has...Yes, your point has merit. I am sure Plaintiff has read many Hoboken stories on-air particularly since Hurricane Sandy when Mayor Zimmer and Hoboken were daily national stories. So one could go back to review all of those to look for ad-libbing and snark.<br /><br />This WNBC on-air commentary that he is a 'paid political hack' has value of another kind.Grafix_Avengerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09277322207313098473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post-50340864491316911942013-09-19T09:16:00.108-04:002013-09-19T09:16:00.108-04:00It depends on whether Mr. Bajardi simply read the ...It depends on whether Mr. Bajardi simply read the story as written or ad libbed a snide remark. If all he did was read the script he was simply doing his job. If he ad libbed there's a serious problem that WINS should be anxious to address quickly, particularly in light of the fact that the defamation case has made them well aware of his history of involvement in local politics.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post-16177910891920190672013-09-19T08:59:34.488-04:002013-09-19T08:59:34.488-04:00Hi Anon @ 8:31 AM. I just responded to this inqui...Hi Anon @ 8:31 AM. I just responded to this inquiry on MSV. <br /><br />The 1010WINS audio has no value in Plaintiff's defamation claim. Zero. He is reading on-air what his station writes for him. <br /><br />Just remember where the burden of proof is, the bar that needs to be met to prove it and how his claims (read the complaint) are undermined by a WNBC broadcaster publicizing his belief to a tri-state audience that "the guy doing the story" on a competing network is a 'paid hack' for Zimmer's opposition. <br /><br />It's good stuff.<br /><br /> Grafix_Avengerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09277322207313098473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post-50710028969747157482013-09-19T08:31:21.914-04:002013-09-19T08:31:21.914-04:00is there any way to find a tape or transcript of w...is there any way to find a tape or transcript of what the hack said on 1010wins? it's been so long since the squirt attended a council meeting, i miss hearing that buttery voice and dime-store spin.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post-19004161418687103042013-09-18T23:52:24.524-04:002013-09-18T23:52:24.524-04:00Love the pic. It so is cute that Lane and Beth had...Love the pic. It so is cute that Lane and Beth had matching little outfits.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post-57097568160830009522013-09-18T22:27:00.996-04:002013-09-18T22:27:00.996-04:00Maybe WNBC would want to cover the douchebag suing...Maybe WNBC would want to cover the douchebag suing two dozen pro-Zimmer bloggers. <br /><br />I'll bet 1010WINS' competitor would love this story. Can't wait till Bertoli blows it up. Boom.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8982097314224201904.post-37523443112445879172013-09-18T21:53:44.937-04:002013-09-18T21:53:44.937-04:00Looking Dapper, Douche!
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-...Looking Dapper, Douche!<br />http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-AzsCd7zx75A/T2IR-gBKTvI/AAAAAAAACAw/agt5dqrYwng/s1600/cammarano+bajardi.jpgbludiamondshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12230563228811256216noreply@blogger.com