Thursday, January 7, 2016

Much ado (and a CLUE) about Professor Pinetop


Well folks, it looks like Bajardi v Pincus email exhibits have surrendered yet another 'group secret'- the identity of a notorious and prolific Hoboken411 screen name.

In fact, this screen name made a cameo appearance during the cross-examination of SLAPPer Plaintiff Lane Bajardi at his trial on February 3, 2015:


Bajardi v Pincus emails show that Plaintiffs take umbrage to the extreme that they are mis-identified as screen names, like "Professor Pinetop."  In fact,  they call such misidentification "slander" and purveyors of the misidentification a "lynch mob."


Uh-oh!

Posting as Red Haven from "all of the MANY work computers I have access to..."

Would his bosses approve?


I guess they wouldn't!

WHO would "drop a dime on [him] to [his] bosses" that he "posts as Red Haven from all of the MANY work computers [he] has access to?"  

Not Professor Pinetop!


Oh, boy.  Dial 1-800-DRA-MAQU(EENS).

"They're trying to kill Red Haven!  Lynch mob! Has anyone in the history of 411 felt this kind of wrath!"

So, with the over-the-top histrionics over misidentification as "Professor Pinetop" is it any surprise that they might know who it is?     Here's the CLUE:



 "John" is professor pinetop?    

46 comments:

  1. Hector Torres JunyaJanuary 7, 2016 at 2:56 PM

    Holy cow, you dropped a lot of bombshells there GA! Happy New Year to you too.

    So Lane was lying to Beth Mason when he played that little game telling her Kim WAS NOT REDHAVEN and he was not professor pinetop.

    The pathological lying cuts itself so very fine. So very fine indeed! Hey Ricky, go ahead and cut them another check!

    Katie Scarlett got it right about Red Haven and who it was or someone close. WoW!
    Direct hit!

    Maureen's husband was a real piece of work. Yikes!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Katie Scarlett knew from another Bloomberg employee that Lane admitted to his wife being Redhaven on Hobokenchat. That other Bloomberg employee thought they might be sharing the name between them on hobokenchat as he (the other bloomberg employee) was an admin on hobokenchat. Katie Scarlett knew what she was talking about because she had friends in the right places.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hector Torres JunyaJanuary 7, 2016 at 4:10 PM

      Oh that's interesting that Lane and Kim were partners in crime online. That makes sense they were operating as an online screen comment team on various boards. Heard they did similarly on Hate411. These are some very devious liars. They must spend a lot of time doing it.

      Had thought that Katie Scarlett was brilliant at deduction.
      Never mind.

      Delete
    2. Sadly no, picking out the people behind the SN is not her forte. Katie Scarlett had inside info.

      Delete
  3. Drama School DropoutsJanuary 7, 2016 at 3:21 PM

    The public hysteria over the wife being called professor pinetop was a facade if they knew professor pinetop was "John." Why didn't they simply ask "John" to clear it up?

    ReplyDelete
  4. In the court transcript Bajardi says calling his wife professor pinetop is a "vicious attack." Why? Is John a fiend or a despot or are the Bajardis lunatics?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I'll take LUNATICS for $400, Alex."

      Delete
    2. Alex, can I have $2,000,000 for the Daily Double SLAPP?

      Delete
    3. Can we play the $276,766 Pyramid next?

      Delete
    4. You give me $276K and you get to keep what's behind the curtain- your condo.

      Delete
  5. These nuts played victim for years. They slapped to get rich quick and tried ruin anyone they could-not only you and Roman. For that they deserve the full weight of justice.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So, it's Mr. Maureen?

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is just embarrassing. This guy is a CBS news reader?

    ReplyDelete
  8. How the hell were they so stupid to let that suit get so far along as to get to discovery? I am still shocked by that. The amount of material you have on everyone in that nasty little cabal is just shocking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's amazing. I have to think that they assumed GA would neither have the interest or resources to go through 50,000 plus emails in a document dump.

      Boy were they wrong

      Delete
  9. All this means is that Sara S thought that this guy John was Pinetop. She might have actually known but she and Kim also spent a lot of time guessing about people's screen names and got an awful lot of them wrong.

    My gut says GA is right but I wouldn't take anything that wacko bird says to the bank.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We've seen Klaussen giving away registrant IDS to Lane like candy. I've no doubt Klaussen gave his ghostwriter pinetops ID, along with everyone else's.

      Delete
    2. Douche-n-KlaussenfluffJanuary 7, 2016 at 7:39 PM

      Pervy gave his little angry ghostwriter everything and anything to keep him writing political content making Beth Mason happy. Who knows how many paperbags passed between her and her favorite "news" site.

      They were in some discussion about about teaming up as full time business. Lane didn't want to sell ads and Fluffer wanted some get physical love. Only half the equation was satiated.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFQo8UKEYcA

      Lane, you feeling satisfied now?

      Delete
    3. Nah. By 2009 Perry K was sharing registrant IDS and emails with his ghostwriter- thats what the emails on GA and MSV have shown.

      Delete
  10. keim? or another john?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not Johnny Kreim, Maureen's John.

      Delete
  11. It is interesting to see that this small group of psychotic misfits who gathered around Beth. Mason not only lied to and about each other but had real a palpable loathing for her and each other.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Furthermore...how on earth does Perry Klaussen show his face again in public, never mind have the nerve to pitch a local business on advertising on his site. These emails show him time and time again being exposed as a lapdog who doesn't "write his own stuff".

    I haven't seen him around town in ages. I think I know why.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's good to have confirmation that they were responsible for missing posts. I looked through the thread this was from and it reminded me of how dreadful that place was.

    I am so grateful to have you and MSV. Those were the bad old days.


    ReplyDelete
  14. Through their own words, the release of these emails will be like a "death by a thousand cuts" to the political, social and community lives of the writers. After being shunned, it is likely most will slink away. It can't happen soon enough.

    Thank you for all you do and have done.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Were Lane, Kim or Sara active in the most recent (Nov 2015) election at all? Just curious if they've already been shunned by local pols.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beth and Ricky backed Carmelo's rancid campaign. That's where the Berjerkoffs felt most comfortable.

      Delete
    2. i know beth/ricky did financially, but wondering about lane/kim/sara in particular. did they actively participate, develop strategy, write articles/speeches, etc., like they did years ago? their names never came up related to the 2015 election, so wondering if they've given up.

      Delete
    3. Except for unibrow they always worked behind the scenes so maybe they just did that again. If not for the SLAPP email release I couldn't tell you who Sara was or if that person lived in America.

      But the plaintiffs had the brilliant idea to pursue this frivolous suit and release all of those emails. How dumb was that?

      Delete
    4. Anon 11:28-

      This slapp was SO dumb, Lane and Kim have added a new idiom to NJ's lexicon: to pull a Bajardi.

      For example, someone sticks dynamite in their ass and lights the fuse. You say, so-and-so pulled a Bajardi.

      Another example: a couple douses themseves with gasoline before they light cigarettes, you could say over the smoking ash heaps that used to be them, shaking your head from side to side, wow that couple sure pulled a Bajardi.

      I can provide more examples if those aren't clear.

      Delete
  16. Maureen is unhinged, and a slob.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Uh, I write these under screen names but Kim isn't Redhaven. Beth wasn't lied to, she didn't need to know. This is beneath Ricky's pay grade to her. I'm writing political comments from my job at Bloomberg but on various computers I have accesss to and deleting internet histories and clearing my tracks but...

    "I am not a political operative."
    "Everyone naturally does these things for Beth Mason. I am deeply in love with Beth and swore allegiance. We all love her. Everyone."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correction: Bajardi was not posting as Red Haven from "various" computers at work, he was posting from "ALL of the MANY computers [he] had access to" at WORK.

      Delete
    2. Who does that? I mean really?? I don't understand. If I'm at work I post from the computer at my desk. I have access to 3 others, but I would never think to login and post from them. I also don't clear my internet history ever. I just think that people who have nothing to hide never even consider these measures.

      Delete
    3. He was sure tempting fate, he could have been fired at any time for such conduct at work.

      I hear he refused to call his boss Ben Mevorach as a trial witness to back up his so-called work related claims. We can see why.

      Delete
    4. The Bajardis filed an Appeal right? If the Appeals court overturns the trial court's dismissal, then you all get another crack at witnesses like Ben Mevorach AND Lane's bosses at Bloomberg. I wonder what his Bloomberg bosses would say when they hear that email read in court. I am sure you have more where that came from. I doubt Mevorach ever read a blog post or cares what anonymous people say. He can tell that to a judge. If Lane's bosses won't answer a subpoena, the court can force them in. The Bajardis have REALLY doubled down on stupid this time.

      Delete
  18. I just read this, still laughing. The asshole risked his JOB by posting as Red Haven on hoboken411 from EVERY work PC he had access to! This is hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Between love and madness lies OB$E$$ION.

      Delete
    2. Flame would never jeopardize anything but a job, condo, or money of a Zimmerists.

      As he said many moons ago to a former councilman: "Me and Beth are going to get your condo."

      Guess you SLAPP-ees have the goods on Mr. Not a Political Operative and his oh so very political operative doings at Bloomberg and 1010 WINS.

      What a shame.

      Delete
    3. Mr/Ms Scumbags, you have a point. On Sept. 19, 2014 when I was representing myself, I got an "offer" to pay $850,000 to make the case go away, including any future appeal. Such an "offer" would have impoverished me, left me with nothing. I suppose that was the idea.

      Delete
  19. How would Stojkovic know whether or not Minutillo had her child enrolled in the public schools?? Why would she care? Stojkovic never supported the Kids First ticket other than Maureen Sullivan who rode the KF coat tails to victory!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly!! 2 1/2 years old is too young for enrollmentin the public school's pre k-3 program. Stojkovic is a creepy stalker-type, obsessed with other people's personal business. A miserable, disgusting human being.

      Delete
  20. I wonder how Stojkovic would feel about people inquiring about her children and where they attend school?? Couldn't she and her husband be considered limited public figures after reading Lane's email dump!! What would provide them cover from having their family life dissected?? Bet they wouldn't like that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She and her pal are rotten, nasty bitches. Remember when she called a bunch of kids at a Zimmer rally "political operatives."

      Delete