The Smearing of Glatt

It's October 27, 2009.

At 10:23 AM Paul Swibinski of Vision Media emails Hoboken 411.

Vision Media was hired by mayoral candidate Beth Mason for her 2009 race.  Aside from Mason,  two other women were in the running for mayor: Dawn Zimmer and Kimberly Glatt.

At 11:22 AM Hoboken411 forwards the email to Lane "not an operative" Bajardi:

At 12:19 PM,  Mason "business partner" James Barracato emails Lane "not an operative" Bajardi: "Here ya go." The email has an attachment.

ATTACHMENT

"GlattForeclosure.pdf" page 2 of 14 pages

Too late, Barracato!

21 minutes earlier, at 11:48 AM, Hoboken411 emailed Lane "not an operative" Bajardi the Glatt foreclosure court documents:

Busy bee, this"not-an-operative" guy!

On October 28, 2009, Hoboken411 breaks the 'Glatt foreclosure' story:

Uh oh, Girlfriend was pissed.

On October 28, 2009 Glatt went to the press, called Hoboken411's story a "smear" and pointed the finger at Beth Mason.  

At 5:13 PM on October 28, James Barracato emails that (not-an-operative) "Hoboken couple" Lane Bajardi and Kim Cardinal Bajardi Glatt's statement to the media.

Oh, dear!  Never piss off a judge.

At 5:25 PM, Lane Bajardi forwarded Barracato's "Glatt Response" email to Hoboken411. Bajardi tells Klaussen "There are many ways to refute this. We can do it tomorrow morning."

At 5:30 PM Klaussen responds:

Glatt's response appeared to throw the Mason camp into 'damage control' mode.

At 1:24 AM on October 29, 2009, Beth Mason emailed Paul Swibinski and political operative Ryan Yaaco: "After talking with Ricky if you want to do a spot and feel we need it.  Go for it."

Mason's email began an exchange about doing the "spot."

At 10:28 AM on October 29, 2009, Barracato sent Kim Cardinal Bajardi  the Swibinski  conference call dial-in and unique PIN number, with instructions: "...at 10:30 we all call in."

Read 3-page email from the bottom up

Wasn't Lane Bajardi on the conference call on the morning of October 29? Or was he busy "doing it"...

... then got tied up posting "many ways to refute" Kim Glatt on Hoboken411 under his admitted screen name "Red Haven"?

Wow!  How does Bajardi know Glatt "sentenced" dogs to death? Could he prove that statement in a court of law or is he lying out of his ass?

Here's Lane Bajardi chiming in with... himself, under his admitted screen name"xyzpdq":

Well folks, politics is a dirty business.  Everybody knows that.  And Glatt was right; it was the Mason smear machine.  Nothing done here was illegal.

But Hoboken's 2nd Ward Councilwoman Beth Mason and her teeming swamp of political operatives have taken a dirty game to new lows.  On July 26, 2012, two of her most loyal operatives rose up out of the swamp, posing as an ordinary "Hoboken couple" to file a defamation  lawsuit demanding $2,000,000, claiming posts calling them political operatives were "defamatory." The judge was not fooled, and threw the garbage out before Defendants could present their case.  In the course of this litigation, tens of thousands of documents were produced proving that all verifiable statements were true.

Hence, not only was this litigation a monumentally stupid move politically-speaking, it took breathtaking arrogance and stunning hypocrisy for such persons to file such claims.  As political operative Tom Bertoli phrased it at his January 9, 2014 deposition: