Friday, March 27, 2015

"I bring my camera everywhere I go"

The following Affidavit was attached to Exhibit B of my Cross Motion to Compel or Dismiss Complaint for Plaintiffs' Failure to Produce Discovery filed on February 20, 2014.

AFFIDAVIT OF IRENE SOBOLOV







The Court dismissed Kim Cardinal Bajardi's claims on September 11, 2014.

The next day, on September 12, 2014, Cardinal-Bajardi was deposed under oath.





Note the abusive, unprofessional treatment ["you're going to look like a moron"] accorded to a pro se litigant. 

In retrospect, ironic words.

60 comments:

  1. Is Mr. Cohen the man we have to thank for giving the plaintiffs legal advice that led to all of these spectacular emails being turned over in discovery and now making their way into the public realm?

    Who's the moron?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is absolutely hilarious. Cohen called someone else a moron? Oh my!

      Delete
  2. Who looks like a "Moron" now JZ?
    You couldn't even get through a trial.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Moron" is a term we use in my family. It translates a "worthy opponent". I think I must have called you my family's word for worthy opponent 50 times in court documents. Hopefully His Honor takes this into account.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Do you love taking pictures of Irene's house?" ROFLMAO.

    ReplyDelete
  5. They clearly are not worthy opponents. They are all damn fools. Their so called lawyer is the biggest idiot out there. What a lowlife crew.

    Nancy you did a great job this family husband and wife team are sinners and you proved it over and over. God help their children.



    ReplyDelete
  6. Please identify the losers attorney so no one ever hires him or his firm.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Had this Cohen character ever tried a case before? I guess its possible that his unprofessional conduct was a clever thought out scheme to intimidate a pro se litigant but it reads more like he's a nasty incompetent buffoon without much of a clue.

    If I were the Bajardis I'd be suing this guy for malpractice - who knows - there could be a payday in this for them after all!

    ReplyDelete
  8. No, this was his first case. But not the first time he called me names. At my deposition, Cohen called me a "loon," peppered his motions with insults- i remember" felonious" was one. Me, felonious. In retrospect calling a nerd like me "felonious" is funny, considering his trial witness list resembled "America's Most Wanted."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting. The Plaintiffs I believe went through a number of lawyers and ended up with someone who had this as a first trial. Very interesting

      Delete
  9. The attorneys who filed it are from Ohio [Whitney Gibson, Vorys] and Pa [Cox]. Cohen took over in Nov. 2013- he's from Pa. When I had asked how he'd gotten the case, he told me that Whitney Gibson was his adversary on another (still ongoing) case. This one: CANNELLA et al v. WATCHDOG et al.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wouldn't referring business to your adversary in an ongoing litigation represent a pretty obvious conflict of interest? Of course given the nature of this case it seems more like Whitman et al was trying to screw their adversary (Cohen) over rather than help him but he didn't know that and it doesn't make their actions any less unethical.

      Delete
  10. Well Kimbo, you can say your kid was ringing the bell, but I don't see how he got around that blob in the doorway.

    ReplyDelete
  11. GA’s link didn't work for me. I found this one:

    https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/Pennsylvania_Eastern_District_Court/2--12-cv-01247/CANNELLA_et_al_v._WATCHDOG_et_al/159/

    Its a defamation case filed in March 2012. In this motion, Plaintiff (Gibson) alleges Cohen and his client destroyed evidence (spoliation) in June 2013. The motion was decided in April 2014- Cohen's client got hit badly, Cohen escaped sanctions. At the same time Cohen is litigating Bajardi v Pincus... a bad faith case he needs to win to "cover Gibson's flank" and his own.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It doesn't smell kosher to me. But these are guys who litigated a SLAPP suit.

      Delete
    2. I took a look at this case. Cohen entered on 2/1/13. Gibson withdrew on 7/22/13. The motion charging spoliation was filed on 10/22/13.

      In short, Gibson dumped this dead dog on his former adversary.

      Delete
  12. Your honor at this time I move to start drinking directly out of this bottle of scotch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Drink up JayZeke, drink up! You're on Hoboken's "internets."
      And to his clients, the bald-faced liars: the cowardly shrew Lane and blubbering lunatic Kim, hearty congratulations for being exposed to all of Hoboken for who you truly are!

      Delete
  13. We can speculate as to why the plaintiff's would have to engage lawyers from PA and OH, but it probably adds up to the fact that no attorney in NY or NJ would touch this frivolous case. I'm surprised it got as far as it did, but aren't there ramifications and punishments from the court to both attorney and plaintiff for mounting bogus lawsuits?

    On another note, Bajardi mentions she had reason to contact Sobolov over block association invites for a street she doesn't live on. Neighbors have complained about how Lane behaves at their block parties, getting vicious over food and a total control freak over the bouncy house, amongst other things. Freaks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "...getting vicious over food and a total control freak over the bouncy house"

      this is so awesome. omg. you made my day, thank you.

      Delete
    2. Some people just feel the need to take their allotted Pizza when they want to leave. Be it at a block party, political meeting, or non-operative political meeting

      Delete
    3. I heard Lane unplugged the air hose off the bouncy house with a kid inside. He said "you know who I am!" to the kid's dad (he didn't).

      Delete
    4. He knows who he is now.

      Delete
    5. He unplugged the bouncy house with a kid inside? WTF???!!! If I were that kid's parent, I would have swept up the street with that self-important twerp, using his ample uni-brow as a mop.

      Delete
    6. I hope the residents on that block make sure the Bajardi's know they're not welcome this summer, regardless of who may be hosting them as guests.

      Delete
    7. If someone unplugged a bouncy house my child was in, I'd make sure that my husband gave him a taste of his knuckle sandwich. Unacceptable.

      Delete
    8. I'd sue him for $2 million.

      Delete
    9. I was there, he was acting like the Hall Monitor. Asking to see everyone's arm band. I witnessed him give Ivan Sobolov ( Irene's non political and super nice husband ) a hard time. Demanding to see his wristband. The Sobolov's LIVE on that block. The Bacardi's live in that poorly maintained walk up building overlooking The Garbage truck lot on and police fleet on Park and Observer . They aren't even residents on the block of the association they tried to commandeer. Lane's new involvement in the block party has sent a chill through a once warm and friendly bunch. They come because Augusta and Fran love them ( why I don't know ) Maybe Lane and Kim can have their own block party in their neighborhood on a mountain of rock salt and auto parts in the Muni Lot?

      Delete
    10. I heard a similar story. Lane and Kim wrecked what used to be a warm and friendly block party. Armbands are Third Reich-ish. Ive never been to a Hoboken block party with armbands. Tough luck on nice lady Augusta, these two party-wreckers who DON'T live on Irene's block should get the heave ho. Like The Donald says: You're FIRED!

      Delete
    11. Didn't Mr Pryzgoda get shoved to the ground once by Anthony Russo while Michael Russo stood by? Why would he be friends with these people who have cozied up to the Russo's like that?

      Delete
    12. Yup. There would be no love lost between the Russo's and Pryzgoda's and yet Mason, with Bajardi's involvement have them as allies. Perhaps now that Fran and Augusta know about Lane's other friends, they won't feel obliged to have them as guests at the block party again.

      Screwing up a block party on a street where they don't live isn't the only damage their gestapo control freak tactics have been seen. When they first moved to town, Kim went on a tirade against the public art mural on Observer highway and got New Jersey Transit to paint over the mushroom cloud. Public art on a public site, executed with public money, devalued and defaced because of a loud mouthed misinformed idiot who had just arrived on the scene, and apparently knew nothing about the Cold War, its tensions and the commission of that work.

      Delete
    13. No way!!!!! I always wondered why that was removed

      Delete
    14. Bottom of Page 12. Unbelievable. Ruining everything they touch

      http://www.njtransit.com/pdf/Oct%2012%202005.pdf

      Delete
    15. Shame on NJ Transit caving to the tantrum of a backwards Minnesota bumpkin to MAR a work of public art! I would support the use of public money to restore the mural to its original state.

      Who does she think she is? So don't LOOK at it if you don't LIKE it. And certainly you didn't have to buy your condo NEAR it, dumbbell,

      I would be interested in the restoration of the mural "Relationships"- it makes NO SENSE without the 'peace' opposing 'war'. This bumpkin's theatrics destroyed the integrity of a work of public art. She's worse than John Ashcroft, who once draped a cloth over the exposed breast of a statue... well at least Ashcroft didn't destroy the breast!

      Restore the mural!

      Delete
    16. Kim Cardinal is lowlife trailer trash with bad taste.
      She married Lane--- and look what she's wearing, it looks like sofa fabric from The Brady Bunch Family Room

      Delete
    17. Fran and Augusta have become Tea Party Republican wing nuts.
      Ask their rent controlled tenants what it's like living in one of their properties while they try to sell the places with families in them

      Delete
    18. Not only did she ruin a mural, you should see the Park Benches inChurch Square after she sat on them! CRASH BANG BOOM!

      Delete
    19. The Bajardis have a long and sick track record in Hoboken. They move here from some distance and wreak havoc wherever they go, whenever they can, by whatever means possible. They destroy public art, mess with the city's financial health, launch bogus lawsuits and do the public bidding for a sociopathic bitch. For what?

      At least with Stojkovic, we now know from MSV's recent post that her involvement had nothing to do with supporting Mason, who she barely tolerates, and everything to do with a vendetta against the mayor.

      So what was in it for the Bajardi's?

      Delete
    20. I believe Lane was truly in Love / Lust with Beth..... and oh yeah later, Ricky's money

      Delete
  14. How can this couple stay in town? Everyone they know is reading these emails and comments on the blogs every day. Honestly, I don't think I'd be willing (or even able) to take it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Lane & Kimmy were the festering boil on the ass of Hoboken. GA & Horsey were the lance. Maybe they can fester somewhere else. Poconos? Ohio? Eighth ring of Hell?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Definitely not in Ohio AnymoreMarch 28, 2015 at 6:58 AM

    Plaintiffs won't be moving to Ohio anytime soon. That was where they went to peddle this POS lawsuit which no one in NY or NJ would touch. If they had been completely honest with their Ohio ambulance chasers, it's doubtful they would have taken the suit either. The only question is how much did the Bajards tell them. That will be the basis for the sequel to the Bajardis' riveting disaster movie - which now qualifies as a franchise for them and their associates.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "Team Mason" would make a great docudrama, wouldn't it? Look at the personalities, the collection of head cases flailing through their endless political circle jerk of campaign mistakes and loses. Actually, a reality show might make for a better format.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, they are like the new century's Manson Family... Hester Skelter with The Mason Family.
      Ricky and Beth aka Charlie and Squeaky

      Delete
  18. Sinatra has a song for Kimbo : "Me and My "Camera" https://youtu.be/e5hXtGkzZ9k

    ReplyDelete
  19. Me and My Shadow: https://youtu.be/i-4uKgXRnpI

    ReplyDelete
  20. Astonishingly, Lane and Kim are throwbacks to a dark era:. armbands at a block party, banning "undesirable" public art (get a mural painted over), banning "undesirable" speech (they don't burn books, they sue bloggers). It seems what they can't control, they seek to destroy. Worse, they believe they are entitled to do so because they are better than the rest of us; they think they should decide what our murals look like and who should comment online. The lawsuit was the last straw. I will no longer engage in conversation with either; I will shun both.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Mr. Bajardi seems to be about as mentally stable as the floor of a bounce house.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The PA and OH attorneys were listed on Superlawyers. They were obviously sought out to add some "legitimacy" to this bs lawsuit. Do you honestly think either would have even picked up the phone if Lane or Kim Bajardi called them? They typically rep corporate clients. Now if a partner at one of the most prestigious firms in the world was to contact them it would be a different story. Do they know anybody like that? ;)

    ReplyDelete
  23. good thing with their fascist attitudes they don't work for a major broadcasting giant...
    nevermind....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yer bucking for an easel. But it's hard to deny it. Between the mural and the lawsuit they have a clear problem with free speech. The block party behavior is just plain bizarre.

      Delete
  24. #laneBajardigraffixavenger
    #1010windslanebajardigraffixavenger
    #1010windslanebajardimsv.com


    ReplyDelete
  25. It would be awesome if someone had video of Lane singing " white christmas " at Vote Hoboken's Kick Off even back in '06 at Helen Hirsch's lair.
    That's where various friends of Beth got up and and planned out their overthrow of reform and turn it into Mason Uber Alas.
    Speeches by Ron Hine, Mike Oliva were interrupted by true reformers asking questions of the groups intent. When the questions got hot, Beth Signaled Lane who then cued John Keim to start up the music on Helen's Baby Grand and Lane had everyone join him around the Piano in Song to distract from the truth.
    Lane has been such pleasant guest at reform evens hasn't he? Leading song... Taking his slice of the pie ( Pizza Pie) , Handing out Cadbury Bars at town meetings and snatching video cameras of bloggers he would later sue.

    What a cancer on human kind!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Not everyone is cut out for city life. There's going to be art you don't like, voices you don't like, food you don't like, noises you don't like, smells you don't like, opinions you don't like, sexuality you don't like, clothes you don't, and long lines you have to wait in where you can't get away from any of that. And none if it is going to be resolved. No one is going to "win" in the end. No one is going away. No one is going to become the person you wish they were. If that's all too much, then perhaps you don't belong here. Not that you belong someplace else, but you might not find things so difficult in more homogenous surroundings.

    After all is said and done, I wonder if that's all that's going on here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting theory, although in the end that might be too complex to explain these two. I think they just lived in a fantasyland that Mason money=power and they would ride Beth and Ricky's financial/political coattails to influential positions at city hall (and knowing how delusional they are, continue that climb in power with Beth to Trenton and Washington when US Senator Mason names them as communications director/political strategists...yes, they are THAT delusional)

      Delete
    2. Lane and Kim from day the stepped into Hoboken acted as if they were some important movers and shakers in the TV news media. Kim a producer for Lou Dobbs and Lane a sometimes on Air "talent" for Bloomberg Cable news
      Word is she attempted to take over Marsh's campaign and write her scripts and even tell her how to apply make up ( the same Kim who consulted on Beth's face paint for her Mayoral Press conference in 2009 If anyone saw that you missed The Joker in Drag) Lane and Kim are not even as sophisticated or successful as The White House Gate Crashers I wish they really did move to Edgewater. Too bad it was a rumor. Hopefully now they only thing they can be seen in around town are Burkas

      Delete
  27. Lane and Kim wouldn't gain admittance into a Leper Colony never mind any real Social Strata.

    First Ward Block Assoc was a stretch for them

    ReplyDelete
  28. Knowing (as proven from their own emails) that Sarah, Kim and Lane obsess over every little online article, blog post and comment, I can't imagine what their lives must be like right now. You just KNOW they are obsessively reading GA and MSV multiple times a day and night (it's what Sarah does, as her own emails point out), it must be KILLING them. And there ain't nuthin' they can do about it except anticipate what new embarrassments will be revealed tomorrow. Think they will ever atone?

    Karma, baby.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous on 3/28 at 8:10 summed it up beautifully. They attempt to control artistic expression, human behavior at social gatherings and thought, through the written word. Whenever people have been allowed to get away with those things, it didn't end well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I go back to the same question over and over: who put them in charge? Who are they to impose anything on anyone? What's their problem?

      Delete